Frequency distribution (%)
In favor of the respondent’s/relative’s side34
In favor of the opposed side35
An agreement between the sides was reached (agreement or plea bargain)10
There was no court ruling (the case was terminated)6
Other1
Not applicable – the process has not finished yet12
DK2

VERDFAV: In whose favor was the court decision made?

Question text: In whose favor was the court decision made?

Note: The question was asked to the respondents, who himself, family member, close relative or close friend had any court experience during the last 5 years.

Values:
  • In favor of the respondent’s/relative’s side
  • In favor of the opposed side
  • An agreement between the sides was reached (agreement or plea bargain)
  • There was no court ruling (the case was terminated)
  • Other
  • Not applicable – the process has not finished yet
  • DK
  • RA

VERDFAV in other datasets:

Single datasets
Time-series datasets

Knowledge and Attitudes of the Population of Georgia towards Judiciary, 2018

Within the project “Facilitating Implementation of Reforms in the Judiciary”, implemented by Human Rights Education and Monitoring Center (EMC) in cooperation with the Institute for Development of Freedom of Information (IDFI) and Caucasus Research Resource Centers (CRRC), CRRC-Georgia conducted a survey among Georgian-speaking adult residents of Georgia regarding population’s perception of justice and its attitudes towards judges, the court system and knowledge of it.

Analyze responses

  • Note: In some cases the percentages do not add up to 100 due to decimal points and rounding.
  • Please use the following citation when citing data from ODA:

    The Caucasus Research Resource Centers. (dataset year) "[dataset name - e.g. Caucasus Barometer]". Retrieved through ODA - http://caucasusbarometer.org on {date of accessing the database here}.